Wolves removed from local ranch after killing calves

Federal wildlife officials are removing a pack of wolves that established a den and developed a habit of killing calves on a ranch south of Ennis.

The Snowshoe Pack moved in late last fall, said Bar 7 ranch manager George Boyd. He and his hands saw them off and on through the winter. Once calving began this spring, they began to show up more often and calves began disappearing.

Last week, Boyd finally discovered a dead calf with enough evidence that he figured officials would be able to confirm it as a wolf kill.

The field trapper for U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services did confirm it was a wolf kill, and that’s where things got thorny.

Wolf management in Montana is complex. It involves two agencies: Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services.

The arrangement has its roots as far back as the initial stages of wolf reintroduction in the 1990s. The two agencies have been involved in wolf management in Montana from the very beginning. Wildlife Services has historically worked with the livestock industry to address livestock depredation from a variety of predators. FWP is the state’s wildlife management agency.

The state first took over management of wolves when they were still listed as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. Montana developed a management plan approved by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services and were allowed to take the lead on wolf management within the state.

Last year wolves were delisted completely and FWP took over full management of their populations, similar to other predators like mountain lions and black bears. However, one vestige of the old operating system hung on – USDA Wildlife Services would continue to be integral in wolf management operations, particularly when it came to collaring, trapping and killing wolves involved in livestock conflicts.

So last week when Boyd saw wolf tracks and big bite marks on his most recent killed calf, he had two agencies to call – FWP and Wildlife Services.

Boyd and the Bar 7 are familiar with wolves. They’ve had problems for at least five years. The typical response from FWP is to remove one or two wolves when there are confirmed wolf kills. When the depredation continues and another cow is killed, the agency will remove the entire pack, Boyd said.

In Montana, FWP has the last say in wolf management. Typically when a depredation occurs an official from Wildlife Services or FWP will confirm whether or not it was a wolf kill, then FWP will develop a plan of action that could range from killing a few wolves, trapping and collaring some to try and get an idea of pack location or even removing an entire pack.

Sometimes the field staff for the two agencies don’t agree on a course of action and when that happens, supervisors get involved, said Pat Flowers, FWP region 3 director in Bozeman.

That’s what happened last week on the Bar 7 Ranch. The Wildlife Services field staff felt removing the entire pack was appropriate given the history of wolf depredation on the ranch. The FWP staff member felt removing two wolves would be the best first step.

Ultimately, the situation was jointly reviewed by management from both agencies and the decision was made to kill the four wolves known to be in the pack, Flowers said.

“In this case, after further discussion, further review, we recognized the writing appeared to be on the wall that that’s where we were headed,” he said.

Montana’s USDA Wildlife Services director John Steuber agreed with Flowers interpretation of the situation.

While a course of action was being discussed between the agency officials, Boyd lost another calf over the weekend. But ultimately, the local Wildlife Services official was able to kill two wolves Tuesday morning.

The lag in the system seems to be with FWP, said Madison County Commissioner Dave Schulz. Boyd contacted Schulz after the local Wildlife Services official couldn’t get a response on a course of action from FWP.

“Apparently there’s a very incredible communication block between the two (agencies),” Schulz said.

FWP knew the Snowshoe Pack was denning on the Bar 7 Ranch and the agency knew the history the ranch has had with wolf depredation, he said. FWP officials should have immediately authorized Wildlife Service to remove the pack once a depredation was confirmed.

“The full pack should have been part of the plan right off the bat,” Schulz said.

Schulz’s frustrations reflect the complications that occur when two agencies are involved in joint management of wolves, Flowers said.

“The process is when we get word that there’s been a depredation then we make the call as to how we’re going to respond to that depredation then we relay that to Wildlife Services,” he said.

Sometimes there are conflicts and disagreements.

“There’s a communication problem to the extent at times we don’t agree and at times we have to follow up either with the specialist or their supervisors and we work through it,” he said. “I think it’s the nature of having shared responsibilities on this issue.”

Sometimes things go smoothly and other times they don’t, Flowers said.

“I think the key is we have to be working with wildlife services as effectively as possible to get a quick turn around on decisions and then to get a response on the ground,” he said. “I think our goal is to be as responsive as possible and (act) as quickly as possible. Sometimes that works well sometimes that doesn’t work as well as we’d like … We’re committed to make this work better.”

The two agencies meet at least annually to review their working relationship, address concerns and any changes that need to be made, Steuber said.

“I think the discussions need to continue always,” he said.

Out at the Bar 7, Boyd seems to understand the way things go. He’s lost several calves this spring, at least three that have seemed to disappear without any sign at all.

“It’s really hard to find anything you can prove,” he said. “If you’re seeing them everyday twice a day you can find a calf that hasn’t been consumed … That’s the frustrating thing about this is it’s so hard to say what’s going on if you don’t find the calf.”

Recently either he or his ranch hands have been patrolling the calving grounds at least once a night, but the wolves seem to just show up after they leave.

“They’re coming in right behind us and leaving tracks in the pick-up tracks,” Boyd said.

The recent wolf-hunting season in Montana may have helped some. But he thinks ranchers should be able to shoot wolves whenever they see them on their ranch.

“Even if they’d let the ranchers shoot wolves on their own property, that would help us out at least during calving season,” Boyd said.

Three times this spring he and his hands have seen wolves amongst his cows and calves.

“It’s fighting an uphill battle,” he said. “It seems like the game we’re playing has rules and the decks stacked a little bit against us.”

The removal of the Snowshoe Pack should offer a bit of a reprieve, Boyd said. But he doesn’t anticipate it will last long. Wolves seem to like the Bar 7.

“They always come back within about a year,” he said.

Montana FWP is currently proposing dramatic changes to the wolf-hunting season. This includes eliminating quotas except in the two wolf management units closest to Glacier and Yellowstone National Parks, extending the season, allowing more liberal season structure and establishing a trapping season. The agency is also planning to propose legislation in 2013 that would allow hunters to shoot more than one wolf and use electronic calls.

FWP is taking public comment on the proposed season changes through June 25.

7 Responses to Wolves removed from local ranch after killing calves

  1. Chris says:

    Four Wolves are killed because of three Calves. Denning also indicates pups which will also be killed (an entire pack is destroyed). Wildlife Services spends more than three times to kill Wolves what ranchers loose in livestock annually and more Wolves are killed annually by WS for depredations than are cows and sheep by Wolves. Wolves took 74 head of cattle last year in Montana out of over 1,300,000. That is less than 1/ 100 th of 1%. Rustlers took over 2,500. Disease, domestic dogs, coyotes, bears and cougars each kill significantly more livestock than Wolves do. Killing wolves does not prohibit livestock depredations and spending more than three times in federal taxpayer money what ranchers loose in livestock is not a prudent expenditure of taxpayer dollars. As has always been the case, the punishment also doesn’t fit the crime. Ranchers need to be more proactive and management policies need to stress lethal control as a last resort, not a first line of defense.

  2. reality22 says:

    The fun of having “maximum predators” it’s the California Model of Wildlife management, maximum Predators at maximum cost to the Pet Owner, Rancher, Taxpayer & game herds. We can thank our easily abused Endangered Species Act for that.

  3. reality22 says:

    Your Federal Tax dollars at work here folks! My God, we need reform at the Federal level!

  4. Chris says:

    Yes we do need Federal reform (and state reform too). Why is everybody spending so much money to kill animals? Seems that this money would be better spent saving lives instead of ending them. Pay ranchers for use of best management practices to prevent depredations. The use of predator deterrents works and has been shown to reduce livestock depredations by predators. All killing does is perpetuate the cycle. “I killed your mother and now you and next your son and his daughter and on and on and on.” This senseless slaughter of animals doesn’t solve any problems, it’s just brutal, archaic, Neanderthal management of wild life.

  5. LadyElk says:

    No Space No Place! I have been saying this for 20 years over the wolf crisis, it’s a sad deal all the way around. in our closed tiny world there is no room for these animals in the semi wild, people can not tolerate their hard earned dollar being eat’n up before it even gets to your dinner table, it’s our bread and butter, it’s like buying a car and having it stolen, then some one telling you, to go talk to the thief to work out an arrangement not to have your next car stolen… like Dr. Phill… hows that working out for you, once a thief, always a thief!, there is no way to reason with the fury gangs the feds have dropped into our back yards. It’s come full circle “again”, will we kill them all? no, we couldn’t do it the last time. so some will live, but not in my cow or horse pasture!

  6. Chris says:

    Sad Lady Elk. “my cow or horse pasture” has belonged to the Wolves (and all of the other indigenous wild life)for thousands of years. You, your cows and your horses are the guests, not the Wolves and other wild life. Put a fence up and some barbed wire to protect your cows and horses. Protect your animals and property from those that you do not wish to intrude. I put a lock on my door to keep people out. I don’t have my gun ready to shoot, that is only if everything else fails to stop and intruder. Wolves and other wild life should be treated the same way. Being arrogant (this is mine and you are not welcome… I will kill you if you show up) and intolerant as well as ignorant of how a healthy ecosystem functions is why wild life doesn’t stand a chance when it comes to humans. Sad Lady Elk, really sad.

  7. Goodbye Northern Rockies says:

    I can’t express how tragic what is happening to our wolves in this sad messed up country feels. I am nearly 52 and Montana and Wyoming have been my families summer vacation place for generations. This issue has proven to me that the people of these states aren’t the romantic, connected to the land people I once thought they were. Last summer and the end of May this year we made Arizona our vacation spot. Killing wolves is still illegal, trapping is not allowed on public land, and mountain lions can’t be hunted with dogs. I date a deer hunter, who like me feels that hatred for any animal does not belong belong in any real hunters heart. Goodbye Montana, you no longer have any value in my eyes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>